Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Viruses ; 15(5)2023 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243887

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the occurrence of maternal primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in Japan. We performed a nested case-control study using data from maternal CMV antibody screening under the Cytomegalovirus in Mother and infant-engaged Virus serology (CMieV) program in Mie, Japan. Pregnant women with negative IgG antibodies at ≤20 weeks of gestation who were retested at ≥28 weeks were enrolled. The study period was divided into 2015-2019 as the pre-pandemic and 2020-2022 as the pandemic period, and the study site included 26 institutions conducting the CMieV program. The incidence rate of maternal IgG seroconversion was compared between the pre-pandemic (7008 women enrolled) and pandemic (2020, 1283 women enrolled; 2021, 1100 women; and 2022, 398 women) periods. Sixty-one women in the pre-pandemic period and five, four, and five women during 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively, showed IgG seroconversion. The incidence rates in 2020 and 2021 were lower (p < 0.05) than that in the pre-pandemic period. Our data suggest a transient decrease in the incidence of maternal primary CMV infection in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic, which could be due to prevention and hygiene measures taken at the population level.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Incidence , Pandemics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin G , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Antibodies, Viral
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e068575, 2022 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2193804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 in pregnant women and to evaluate the impact of disease severity on preterm birth. DESIGN: A case-control study based on data from a nationwide questionnaire-based survey of maternity services in Japan. SETTING: A questionnaire was mailed to all 2135 delivery institutions in Japan between July and August 2021. A total of 1288 institutions responded (60% of all delivery institutions in Japan). 566 facilities reported having cared for pregnant women with COVID-19, and 722 facilities reported having had no such patients. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand and forty-three hospitalised and non-hospitalised pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 between July 2020 and 30 June 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was progression to severe COVID-19. The secondary outcome was preterm birth due to COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: 56 cases (5.4%) were severe, and 987 (94.6%) were non-severe. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that gestational age≥24 weeks (adjusted OR (aOR) 6.68, 95% CI 2.8 to 16.0) and maternal age≥32 years (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.3) were independently associated with severe cases. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the probability of continued pregnancy at 14 days after diagnosis for severe cases was 0.57 between 24 and 31 weeks' gestation and 0.27 between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation. The probability for non-severe cases was 1.0 between 24 and 31 weeks' gestation and 0.8 between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation. Among the patients with COVID-19 in the preterm period, preterm birth due to infection was significantly more common in severe than non-severe cases (48% vs 6%, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe COVID-19 in pregnant women was associated with gestational age≥24 weeks and maternal age≥32. The rate of preterm delivery due to the infection was significantly higher in severe COVID-19 cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infant , Adult , Premature Birth/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Pregnant Women , Japan/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
3.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; : 1-4, 2022 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2051003

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Serious group A streptococcal (GAS) infections and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) are rare conditions, but their rapid progression often results in death. The purpose of the present study was to clarify recent trend after the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic of GAS infection in Japan.Materials and Methods: Maternal death statistics were analyzed by the Japan Maternal Death Exploratory Committee.Results: Maternal deaths due to GAS-TSS accounted for 4.2% (n = 22) of all maternal deaths in Japan (n = 525) in the last 12 years. GAS-TSS remains one of the leading causes of maternal death after obstetric hemorrhage and hypertensive disorder. However, no maternal deaths due to GAS-TSS have been reported since the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan after the last death occurred in February 2020.Conclusions: The major change during this period was that most Japanese people wore facemasks at all times and did frequent disinfection. It is considered that the reduction in the incidence of GAS infections itself reduced the number of serious GAS-related maternal deaths. Wearing facemasks and frequent disinfection during pregnancy might to be recommended to prevent various infectious diseases including serious GAS infection, even after the COVID-19 pandemic era.

4.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 14042, 2022 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1991677

ABSTRACT

To investigate the relationships between communicative and critical health literacy (CCHL) and anxiety and depressive symptoms (ADs) in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A cross-sectional study was conducted and 5466 pregnant women responded in Japan in September 2020. A Kessler 6 scale (K6) score ≥ 10, an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score ≥ 13, and four CCHL groups were analyzed using a logistic regression model and trend test. The proportions of pregnant women with a K6 score ≥ 10 and EPDS score ≥ 13 were 13.5 and 15.4%, respectively. In comparisons with the low CCHL group, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for anxiety symptoms was 0.770 (0.604-0.982) in the high CCHL group, while those for depressive symptoms were 0.777 (0.639-0.946), 0.665 (0.537-0.824), and 0.666 (0.529-0.838) in the lower, higher, and high CCHL groups (all p < 0.05), respectively, after adjustments for potential confounding factors, such as age, weeks of gestation, complications, history, number of children, marital status, education, employment, and income. Higher CCHL was associated with significantly lower adjusted odds ratios for anxiety (p for trend = 0.019) and depressive symptoms (p for trend < 0.001). These results suggest a relationship between CCHL and ADs in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Literacy , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(11): 2721-2729, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1978492

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the utility of the risk score in assessing the current status and prognosis of COVID-19 in pregnancy. METHODS: Seventy-seven cases affected before the Omicron variant epidemic and 50 pregnant cases affected by the Omicron variant were included. The risk score consists of maternal background, current condition, and examination findings. We determined the risk score in the early stages of disease onset. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the maternal or gestational ages between the groups. The risk score was significantly lower in the After-Group patients (those affected during the Omicron epoch), while 14.3% of the Before-Group patients (those affected during the pre-Delta and Delta epochs), experienced a worsening of disease after the visit to the center, whereas none of the After-Group patients did. The Before Group's frequency of risk score items was higher among the two groups for "fever for ≥48 h," "mild pneumonia image," and "blood tests," whereas "disease onset 14 days after the second vaccination" was increased in After Group. The blood test parameters for platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score system appeared superior in detecting deteriorating cases. There were no cases of post-illness deterioration in the After-Group, suggesting that cases of the Omicron variant in pregnancy may have had a less severe course compared to that of previous variants. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of a specific blood test evaluation, suggesting the need for a combined evaluation of cases affected during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(9): 2325-2333, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909460

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the tolerability of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS/IMB) therapy in pregnant women with COVID-19 in Japan and its impact on the neonate and process of delivery. METHODS: Eight cases of pregnancy complicated by COVID-19 and requiring hospitalization during the delta variant epidemic were included. Gestational age, initial symptoms, pregnancy complications and outcome, severity of illness, blood test findings at the time of treatment initiation and on days 3-5 after administration, body temperature at administration, and 8, 24, and 48 h post-administration, delivery outcome, and neonatal findings were recorded. Ten pregnant women who required hospitalization at the same time and did not receive CAS/IMB were used as controls. RESULTS: Of the eight cases, seven were mild, and one case was of moderate severity. Body temperature in the CAS/IMB group was significantly higher at 8 h post-administration than that at the time of administration. However, body temperature significantly reduced at 24 and 48 h post-administration in the CAS/IMB group compared with that in the control group. There were no apparent adverse events after CAS/IMB administration. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal administration of CAS/IMB was safe. Although it was difficult to evaluate the improvement in disease by blood test findings, the fever improved within 24 h, which suggests rapid improvement in patient condition.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(7): 1978-1982, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1861445

ABSTRACT

Although various perinatal outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pregnancies have been reported, the fetal and neonatal consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remain unclear. Several reports of miscarriages and stillbirths have been recorded, but vertical transmission by SARS-CoV-2 is considered very rare, and the cause remains unknown. We report a case of a 22-year-old uncomplicated Japanese woman infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the second trimester, resulting in intrauterine fetal death due to placental insufficiency associated with COVID-19 placentitis. This report emphasizes the importance of longitudinal assessment of fetal well-being by fetal heart rate monitoring and early detection of maternal coagulation dysfunction representing SARS-CoV-2 inflammation to manage COVID-19 in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , COVID-19 , Chorioamnionitis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Female , Fetal Death/etiology , Heart Rate, Fetal , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Placenta , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , SARS-CoV-2 , Stillbirth , Young Adult
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 636, 2021 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1779616

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few reports have presented an overall view of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across an entire country and throughout the entire gestation period. Furthermore, no such reports are available for Japan. We examined the clinical characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID­19 on a national scale in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide questionnaire-based survey for all 2,185 maternity services in Japan was conducted between July and August 2020. Information regarding maternal characteristics and epidemiological, clinical, treatment, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 between 16 January and 30 June 2020 were collected. Main outcome measures were incidence of pregnant women with COVID-19 and infant infection, positive rate of the universal screening test for asymptomatic pregnant women, identification of infection route and rates of maternal death, and severe cases. RESULTS: Responses from 1,418 institutions were assessed (65% of all delivery institutions in Japan). Seventy-two pregnant women were reported to have been diagnosed with COVID-19. The positive rate of the universal screening test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among asymptomatic pregnant women was 0.03% (2/7428). The most common route of infection was familial (57%). Fifty-eight pregnant women with COVID-19 were symptomatic, of whom five (8.6%) had a severe infection and one died (a tourist). Severe respiratory symptoms, oxygen administration, and pneumonia were frequently reported in the third trimester and postpartum period compared with in early pregnancy (22.2% vs 2.5% [P = 0.03], 38.9% vs 7.5% [P = 0.01], and 50.0% vs 7.5% [P < 0.001], respectively). All pregnant women with COVID-19 underwent caesarean sections, regardless of symptoms. There were no SARS-CoV-2 transmissions to newborns. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, the number of cases of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women is very low. Compared with early pregnancy, late pregnancy may be a risk factor for exacerbation of symptoms and familial transmission is the most common route of infection. The importance of infection prevention should be emphasised, especially in women in late pregnancy, their families, and any cohabitants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adult , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Japan/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 47(9): 3001-3007, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1276735

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to clarify the physical and mental burden of the COIVD-19 pandemic on obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan and to identify factors that increase the burden of their psychological stress. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent to obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan via email and social media to collect voluntary responses. This survey was conducted from September 1 to 30, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 852 valid responses were included in the analysis; 76% (644) of the physicians felt that the COVID-19 pandemic caused them physical and mental stress equal to or greater than the most severe disaster they had ever experienced. Physicians who reported high mental and physical stress were more likely to be in areas with high numbers of infected patients (odds ratio (OR) 1.571, p = 0.012). Physicians experienced great stress to the point of wearing heavy personal protective equipment during routine vaginal deliveries by mothers with no COVID-19 symptoms. This trend was markedly pronounced for physicians working in regions with fewer cases of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians and gynecologists who reported high mental and physical stress were more likely to be in areas with high numbers of infected patients. One potential reason for this may be that they were required to wear more personal protective equipment than necessary. Infection control methods that ensure the safety of obstetricians and gynecologists while not causing unnecessary physical or psychological stress are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 47(9): 2990-3000, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1276734

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate psychological stress among pregnant and puerperal women in Japan during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited pregnant women and puerperal women who delivered between January and September 2020 in Japan, using an online questionnaire. Participants were divided into low, middle, and high groups according to the degree of the epidemic in their region of residence. Related factors were analyzed using the chi-squared test. The relationship between COVID-19 epidemic regions and depression risks and anxiety using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Kessler 6 scale (K6) was evaluated using a univariate and multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 7775 cases, including 4798 pregnant and 2977 puerperal women, were analyzed. The prevalence of high EPDS and K6 scores was significantly increased in pregnant women in the high than those in the low epidemic regions (EPDS: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.453, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.205-1.753; K6: aOR 1.601, 95% CI 1.338-1.918). There was no difference in EPDS score, but the prevalence of high K6 scores was significantly increased in puerperal women in the high than those in the low epidemic regions (aOR 1.342, 95% CI 1.066-1.690). Further, restriction on going to their hometown for delivery increased the prevalence of high EPDS scores among pregnant (aOR 1.663, 95% CI 1.296-2.133) and puerperal women (aOR 1.604, 95% CI 1.006-2.557). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased support due to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the psychological status of pregnant and puerperal women; hence, investing medical resources in their healthcare essential.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depression, Postpartum , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , SARS-CoV-2 , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
11.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251434, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1236587

ABSTRACT

A nationwide questionnaire survey about community-acquired infection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was conducted in July 2020 to identify the characteristics of and measures taken by Japanese medical facilities providing maternity services. A case-control study was conducted by including medical facilities with (Cases) and without (Control) community-acquired infection of COVID-19. Responses from 711 hospitals and 707 private clinics were assessed (72% of all hospital and 59% all private clinics provided maternity service in Japan). Seventy-five COVID-19-positive pregnant women were treated in 52 facilities. Community-acquired infection was reported in 4.1% of the facilities. Of these, 95% occurred in the hospital. Nine patients developed a community-acquired infection in the maternity ward or obstetric department. Variables that associated with community-acquired infection of COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) were found to be state of emergency prefecture (4.93 [2.17-11.16]), PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 on admission (2.88 [1.59-5.24]), and facility that cannot treat COVID-19 positive patients (0.34 [0.14-0.82]). In conclusion, community-acquired infection is likely to occur in large hospitals that treat a higher number of patients than private clinics do, regardless of the preventive measures used.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL